Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri Sediaan Hand Sanitizer Yang Di Produksi Secara Lokal Terhadap Bakteri Staphylococcus Aureus

Authors

  • asri wido mukti Universities PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.pji.2021.006.02.10

Keywords:

Antibacterial activity test, Covid-19, Hand Sanitizer, Staphylococcus Aureus

Abstract

The increasing status of corona disease (Covid -19) to become a pandemic by WHO has caused people to panic buying for several medical equipment, which is Hand Sanitizer. Some individuals took the opportunity to benefit from making their own Hand Sanitizers whose formula was questionable because they did not have a distribution license and were traded freely in the marketplace so that their quality was questionable. Therefore, this study aims to determine the antibacterial activity of Hand Sanitizers which are produced without a distribution permit and are traded freely in the marketplace against S.aureus bacteria. The method used is by using the disc diffusion technique and the zone of inhibition is determined. This study uses a positive control in the form of a Hand Sanitizer which has a distribution license and an oil carrier as a negative control. Five samples of Hand Sanitizer was collected from marketplace based on their popularity and there are inhibition zones only in the sample code HS1 (70% alcohol and castor oil) and HS5 (70% alcohol) with an inhibition zone diameter of 1.8 mm and 4.3 mm which shows a growth inhibition response to bacteria S.aureus is very weak. It can be concluded that the antibacterial activity of this locally produced Hand Sanitizer is very weak in inhibiting S.aureus bacteria.

Author Biography

asri wido mukti, Universities PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana, Surabaya, Indonesia

References

Al-mamun et al, 2016. Characterization and evaluation of antibacterial and antiproliferative activities of crude protein extracts isolated from the seed of Ricinus communis in Bangladesh. BMC complementary and alternative medicine 16:211.

Babeluk et al, 2014. Hand hygiene--evaluation of three disinfectant hand sanitizers in a community setting. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e111969.

Bauer et al, 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–6BPOM

Burton et al, 2011. The Effect of Handwashing with Water or Soap on Bacterial Contamination of Hands. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 97-104.

CDC, 2008. Guideline For Disinfection and Sterilizationin Healthcare Facilities : Peracetic Acid Sterilization.

Chadwick et al, 2017. Effect of Hand Sanitizer on the performance of fingermark detection Techniques. Forensic Science International 273 (2017) 153–160

Greenwood, 2000. Detection of antibiotic resistance in vitro. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 14(4):303-6

Jia jing et al, 2020. Hand Sanitizers: A Review on Formulation Aspects, Adverse Effects, and Regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 May 11;17(9):3326

kampf et al, 2020. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. Journal of Hospital Infection 104 (2020) 246e251.

Kemenkes, 2018. Pedoman Bimbingan Teknis Perizinan Perbekalan Keshatan Rumah Tangga.

Leonardo et al, 2001. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a castor oil-based irrigant. Journal of Endodontics volume 27, issue 12, p717-719, december 01, 2001.

Tuladhar et al, 2015. Reducing viral contamination from finger pads: handwashing is more effective than alcohol-based hand disinfectants. Journal of Hospital Infection. volume 90, issue 3, p226-234, july 01, 2015

valgas at el, 2007. Screening methods to determine antibacterial activity of natural products. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38:369–80

WHO, 2009. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care.

Widmer, 2000. Replace Hand Washing with Use of a Waterless Alcohol Hand Rub?. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000;31:136–43

Xia ma et al, 2020. Potential utilities of maskâ€wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARSâ€CoVâ€2. Journal of Medical Virology 2020;1-5.

Zaidah et al, 2015. Uji Perbandingan Efektivitas Antiseptik Strong Acidic Water Terhadap Antiseptik Standar Etaol 70%. Prosiding Penelitian Univerisitas Islam Bandung (Kesehatan dan Farmasi)

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles